Re: KDE 3.5

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: KDE 3.5
• From: V P <list307@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:42:58 +0530
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k5aIcnobXFJJhYsERuY5ZxdFy5E0drqaSP7QczLSNiX9LfM3uax4Nt66tar52Rgf4pwDdmrqvysNIsGwUOxHLUSP94ie3qRYJk7Uo3v98Y+q+6nGZCGM4i/TCNxh+kNrxwatAzZ1tPoc4XGnp9exj3ICzxI+G5fwK73YbbEuoY8=
• In-reply-to: <doetg1$jih$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <1135271656.3838.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <doetg1$jih$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/23/05, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > I would like to know why this version was pushed directly in FC-4 and
> > not in update-testing before.
> Excellent question.

Maybe it was prompted by the rather long "Is RH/Fedora ignoring KDE" discussion.

vjp

--
Registered Linux User #374218

Minister of Offense, Preserver of the Way
of the Great Llama, Ambassador to India
for the Republic of Loungevania

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KDE 3.5
    • From: Rex Dieter

• References:
  • KDE 3.5
    • From: Eric Tanguy
  • Re: KDE 3.5
    • From: Rex Dieter

• Prev by Date: Re: KDE 3.5
• Next by Date: Help uninstalling extra languages from Open Office
• Previous by thread: Re: KDE 3.5
• Next by thread: Re: KDE 3.5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread