So, then, I should not use rndc with bind? If so, then this could be more easier, since I then I could assign an ACL of the server to wich send transfers or get from. The question is because, by default, bind come with rndc in fedora, and I don't wanted to create a new problem by disabling it. Thanks. El sáb, 17-12-2005 a las 18:05 +1030, Tim escribió: > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 23:26 -0300, Gaston wrote: > > Does anybody know of a howto to configure bind with rndc for use with > > zone transfers? > > > > I need to configure 2 fedora servers, and I don't want to duplicate > > the dns records manually on each server. > > > > If you have any help, this will be so much appreciated. > > Since you asked for any help, here goes: > > You don't have to manually duplicate DNS records, just set up your slave > servers' named.conf file appropriately (as slaves for some domains), and > it'll get the records from the master server (assuming the master server > isn't set to prohibit that - it usually isn't). > > I, too, would like to try using rndc for reconfiguration issues. It > seems like it ought to be able to do such things (e.g. add a new host to > a zone record, without having to restart the server manually, or fire up > some convoluted configuration GUI). But I can't see a way to do so. > The rndc man file suggests the tool is far from ready. > > -- > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. > I read messages from the public lists. >
