hi i'm new to linux . i've just got a new window manager --enlightenment.can somebody please help me with the instructions about how to install it on my FC3. On 12/12/05, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: SOLVED: sane-backends problem with FC4 and x86_64 > (Erik P. Olsen) > 2. Wrong fs type detected (David J. Bakeman) > 3. Re: rootkit? (Gene Heskett) > 4. Re: rootkit? (Scot L. Harris) > 5. Re: rootkit? (Gene Heskett) > 6. Firefox 1.5 (John Francis) > 7. Re: Cups Troubles (Tod Thomas) > 8. Re: rootkit? (Michael A. Peters) > 9. Re: rootkit? (Ralf Corsepius) > 10. Re: Wrong fs type detected (Terry Polzin) > 11. cannot find canonical DNS on slmodem PPP connection > (Globe Trotter) > 12. Re: Wrong fs type detected (Jeff Vian) > 13. Re: Bug report requests for Fedora build of OpenOffice.org > software (Jeff Vian) > 14. Alsa (Sound) (CodeHeads) > 15. Re: Alsa (Sound) (Dave Jones) > 16. Re: Alsa (Sound) (CodeHeads) > 17. Re: Alsa (Sound) (Dave Jones) > 18. Question about Java on Fedora 4 (Hoffmann) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:18:42 +0100 > From: "Erik P. Olsen" <erik@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SOLVED: sane-backends problem with FC4 and x86_64 > To: erik@xxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1134343122.4569.13.camel@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 00:41 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > Sane is implemented in FC4/x86_64 with one x86_64 frontend and two (i386 > > and x86_64) backends. I guess the i386 backends are there to interface > > to i386 only frontends and the x86_64 backends interface xsane and > > scanimage. > > > > My problem with this approch is that I need to upgrade sane-backends to > > the latest level which I would normally do by compiling them according > > to the instructions found on the sane projects web pages. However, such > > compilations will only affect the i386 elements and therefore I'll not > > have the upgrade I thought. Does anybody know how I should compile the > > x86_64 version? The sane-project doesn't know and refer to the Fedora > > team packagers who apparently have done it all by themselves. > > > > Would a decent circumvention be to erase the sane packages from the > > system and compile new ones to an i386 platform or will that not work? > Following applies a fix to the x86_64 version of sane-backends assuming > it has been copied into the standard source: > > 1. rpm -e --nodeps sane-backends-1.0.15-9.x86_64 > 2. CFLAGS="-m64" ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/lib64 -- > prefix=/usr > 3. make > 4. make install > > -- > Regards, > Erik P. Olsen > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:52:41 -0800 > From: "David J. Bakeman" <dbakeman@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Wrong fs type detected > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <439CD7E9.6090300@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I > plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following: > > FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature. > Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1) > FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1) > invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f) > File system has been set read-only > > > I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two > other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3 > both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted. > Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized: > > Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux > > > Any ideas?? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:12:56 -0500 > From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rootkit? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200512112112.56210.gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote: > >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote: > >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio. > >> I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral > >> attack on January 5. > > > >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago, > > including my laptops. :) > > Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on the > next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router. > > Jim has collected all the stuff ( the logs weren't cleaned a bit, which > helps a lot) and will tarball and fwd it to the requester who asked > for it as soon as the re-install is done. > > -- > Cheers, Gene > People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this > address: <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which bypasses vz's > stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) > Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above > message by Gene Heskett are: > Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:19:29 -0500 > From: "Scot L. Harris" <webid@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rootkit? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1134353969.3324.147.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:12, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote: > > >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote: > > >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio. > > >> I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral > > >> attack on January 5. > > > > > >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago, > > > including my laptops. :) > > > > Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on the > > next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router. > > > > Well he was asking about the sober virus that is suppose to hit out > there again January 5th. As far as I know that virus targets Windows > systems only. :) > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:29:24 -0500 > From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rootkit? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200512112129.24625.gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Sunday 11 December 2005 21:19, Scot L. Harris wrote: > >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:12, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote: > >> >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote: > >> >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and > >> >> Ohio. I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted > >> >> viral attack on January 5. > >> > > >> >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago, > >> > including my laptops. :) > >> > >> Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on > >> the next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router. > > And my fingers didn't keep up with my mind above, I intended to say it > was sitting on the next port of the switch, beside 2 other winduhs > boxes. The wifey uses windows in her teaching too and the son has a > laptop in his room too. > > >Well he was asking about the sober virus that is suppose to hit out > >there again January 5th. As far as I know that virus targets Windows > >systems only. :) > > Yeah, the 5th should be interesting, if only from the screaming of all > the oxes that get gored that day. From people who have this attitude > that 'my box is safe, its never been bothered before has it?' > > -- > Cheers, Gene > People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this > address: <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which bypasses vz's > stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) > Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above > message by Gene Heskett are: > Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:54:14 +1100 > From: John Francis <john.francis@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Firefox 1.5 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <a56beb020512111854x2b433396q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > So are we going to see Firefox 1.5 released for FC4? > > -- > Kind regards, > > John Francis > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051212/b6c5b3f5/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 -0500 > From: Tod Thomas <tod@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Cups Troubles > To: Ankush Grover <ankush174@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <439CE647.2060405@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Ankush Grover wrote: > > > > > > On 12/8/05, *Tod Thomas* <tod@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tod@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > Tod Thomas wrote: > > > I am trying to print from FC4 client to WinXP workstation with a > > share > > > defined to an Epson Stylus Photo RX600 printer. I am trying to > > connect > > > with a user account defined on the XP box. > > > > > > In the CUPs web GUI when it comes time to configure the Device > > URI I'm > > > specifying smb://user:password/ipaddress/sharename > > <smb://user:password/ipaddress/sharename>. This should work, > > > in fact I have validated the connectivity to the XP box with > > smbclient. > > > The problem is I have special characters in the password, > > particularly > > > the '@' symbol. I have a feeling that is throwing CUPs off. I > > tried > > > making the change directly to printers.conf but that didn't make a > > > difference. > > > > > > Make that: smb://user:password@ipaddress/sharename > > > > > > hey, > > > > > > > > You can also print normally means configure the printer through > > system-config-printer and set the queue type as samba. > > > Thanks! That's what I needed. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:27:41 -0800 > From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rootkit? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1134358062.5525.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53 -0500, David Cary Hart wrote: > > > > > > Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio. I > > hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral attack > > on January 5. > > My birthday :D > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:51:25 +0100 > From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rootkit? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1134359485.28658.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 17:33 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: > > Michael A. Peters wrote: > > > Sun use to (still does?) allow you to enter an md5sum and it would tell > > > you exactly what file it matched, along with what patch level. > > > > Ralf Corsepius replied: > > > rpm based systems have "rpm {-V|--verify}", which provide a comparable > > > feature. > > > > Unfortunately, this is pretty useless if you can't trust the RPM > > database. > True, nevertheless, it still gives valuable hints when trying to find > out whether you have been comprised. > > Also, as compromising the RPM-db requires root access, compromising the > RPM-db is still one level more unlikely to happen than finding mal-ware > in a user's home or tmp. > > > And on a compromised machine, you can't trust the RPM database. > Sure, but at some point, paranoia has got to end and you'll have to > trust something. > > > And, unfortunately, prelinking means that you can't even compare them to > > a "known good" machine. > Yep. > > Wrt. this, prelinking can be considered a security risk, as well as some > of RH's packaging conventions (e.g. allowing unowned file and using > "alternatives"). > > So I agree, rpm -V is of very limited use, but it is way from being > useless. > > Ralf > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:00:44 -0500 > From: Terry Polzin <fox3ec208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Wrong fs type detected > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200512112300.48006.fox3ec208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Sunday December 11 2005 20:52, David J. Bakeman wrote: > > I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I > > plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following: > > > > FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature. > > Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1) > > FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1) > > invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f) > > File system has been set read-only > > > > > > I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two > > other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3 > > both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted. > > Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized: > > > > Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > > /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux > > > > > > Any ideas?? > When was the last time fsck was run against the partition > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051211/a156a408/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:03:58 -0800 (PST) > From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: cannot find canonical DNS on slmodem PPP connection > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20051212050358.44291.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I have a strange problem on a PPP connection. I am using slmodem (logging in > from India) on travel. I get through fine, using slmodem on my PCTEL modem, > and > get the following, but get a can not find canonical DNS. Hence I can not > connect to the web using linux. Any suggestions? > > By the way, here are some details: > > $ ifconfig > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:708 (708.0 b) TX bytes:708 (708.0 b) > > ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol > inet addr:61.2.0.216 P-t-P:61.0.128.83 Mask:255.255.255.255 > UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:80 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 > RX bytes:302 (302.0 b) TX bytes:5710 (5.5 KiB) > > > > > Also, this is the transaction when I used wvdial: > > > > > --> WvDial: Internet dialer version 1.54.0 > --> Initializing modem. > --> Sending: ATZ > ATZ > OK > --> Sending: ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +FCLASS=0 > ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +FCLASS=0 > OK > --> Modem initialized. > --> Sending: ATDT172222 > --> Waiting for carrier. > ATDT172222 > CONNECT 44000 > --> Carrier detected. Waiting for prompt. > Welcome to UTStarcom Total Control HiPer ARC (TM) > Networks That Go The Distance (TM) > login: > --> Looks like a login prompt. > --> Sending: username > Password: > --> Looks like a password prompt. > --> Sending: (password) > ~[7f]}#@!}!}!} }?}!}$}%j}"}&[7f][7f][7f][7f]}%}&])S}6}'}"}(}"}1}$}%j}3}#} > ]H~ > --> PPP negotiation detected. > --> Starting pppd at Sat Dec 10 18:00:49 2005 > --> pid of pppd: 2704 > --> Using interface ppp0 > --> local IP address 61.2.0.216 > --> remote IP address 61.0.128.83 > --> primary DNS address 61.0.128.65 > --> secondary DNS address 61.0.0.5 > > > And I get the following when I use fetchmail: > > ....... > fetchmail: couldn't find canonical DNS name of mailserver > > When I use firefox or dillo, I also get the same thing. When I try to ssh > out > to my work machine, I get temporary failure in name resolution. > > Any suggestions/help? Btw, I am running Fedora Core 4 and the latest version > of > slmodem. > > Many thanks and best wishes! > Globe. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:05:44 -0600 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Wrong fs type detected > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1134363944.4342.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 23:00 -0500, Terry Polzin wrote: > > On Sunday December 11 2005 20:52, David J. Bakeman wrote: > > > I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I > > > plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following: > > > > > > FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature. > > > Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1) > > > FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1) > > > invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f) > > > File system has been set read-only > > > > > > > > > I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two > > > other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3 > > > both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted. > > > Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized: > > > > > > Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders > > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > > > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > > > /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux > > > > > > > > > Any ideas?? > > Interesting that the error about FAT above is on /dev/sdb1 and you > showed the fdisk output from /dev/sdc. > > Are you sure you are looking at the error on the proper drive.? > > > > When was the last time fsck was run against the partition > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:09:58 -0600 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Bug report requests for Fedora build of OpenOffice.org > software > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1134364198.4342.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 22:10 +0300, Strong wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:40:35 -0400 Peter Arremann <loony@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > For one or another reason a distribution repackages code and then the > > > upstream providers will not help you out. > > First, thanks Peter for explanation on how things are going on with the > > package developers and their relation on our bug reports of their > > products. > > > > but the question arises, How to live farther? Or, in other words. What > > is the distribution that can be used in order to get help from the > > package developers? > > > > Thank You for You answer. > > > > PS Assuredly, multiple distributions is a Great Evil! > > > > This is true only if you WANT to be told exactly what you can and cannot > have and how to use it. > > Multiple distributions is a result of the freedom to choose what to make > available (distributors) and to choose what to use (users). > > Also, note that you are not locked into using only what is packaged in > the distribution, but can add or delete packages as you choose. > > Therefore, the answer to your question is: Install the package directly > from the developers and then you may get their support. > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Strong. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:15:38 -0500 > From: CodeHeads <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Alsa (Sound) > To: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <439D077A.5080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hello all, > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I found > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled. > Am I missing something?? > > ~WILL~ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:18:23 -0500 > From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20051212051822.GA3052@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I found > > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some > > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa > > > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled. > > Am I missing something?? > > Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ? > > Dave > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:26:38 -0500 > From: CodeHeads <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <439D0A0E.9050006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I > found > > > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some > > > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa > > > > > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled. > > > Am I missing something?? > > > > Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ? > > > > Dave > > I would do that in the alsamixer in the shell...right?? Sorry stupid > question LOL I usually do not mess with the sounds system in linux. I > just started working with it on my desktops. > > ~WILL~ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:33:14 -0500 > From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20051212053314.GB3052@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:26:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote: > > Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I > found > > > > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are > some > > > > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa > > > > > > > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system > enabled. > > > > Am I missing something?? > > > > > > Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ? > > > > > > Dave > > > > I would do that in the alsamixer in the shell...right?? Sorry stupid > > question LOL I usually do not mess with the sounds system in linux. I > > just started working with it on my desktops. > > Or kmix. (Though which of 'red' or 'yellow' means set/unset is lost on me > (I use gnome). I'm totally in awe of the KDE developers hci skills on that > one. > They must be great fun at parties. > "Did you switch the music on?" "Yellow!" > > Dave > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:36:57 -0800 (PST) > From: Hoffmann <oasf2004@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Question about Java on Fedora 4 > To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20051212053657.31688.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi All, > > I have no previous experience with java programming, and my questions are > related to java on FC4. My OS is Fedora x86_64 and my processor is an Intel > EM64T. I realized that my Java versionis the 1.4.2, and I was not able to > upgrade it by using yum. My questions are: > > (1) Could anyone, please, let me know how could I upgrade java to the > latest version? Is the best option to wait for the newest version be > released by yum? > > (2) The most impottant question: What about the Java Virtual Machine? I > realized that some applications I would like to install/run are generating a > warning about not being able to find the JVM on my machine? How could I > solve this problem? Is it already installed? If affirmative, how could I > make JVM be recognized by those applications? > > Thanks a lot in advance! > Best, > Hoffmann > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Shopping > Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051211/fe2cb495/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 104 > ******************************************** > -- sujit
