2005/12/1, John Summerfied <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > > > >>Fortunately, that bit my laptop. > >>Oh, and the first fixed one wasn't, I'm not sure about the second and > >>about then I lost interest in new kernels for a few months. > > > > > > Luckily the root exploit holes in those kernels weren't being widely > > exploited in the wild, or you might have been making that car ride. :) > > > > Fedora is not for real work. Fedora is a rolling beta:-) > > If it matters, get something more stable wrt changes. > > Note, I do use Fedora, but not on servers and not where a breakage matters. > > Wrt those serious folk on Nahant, one of them was mumbling the other day > about 10,000 machines. > > You do not roll out updates to 10,000 machines if there is any > likelihood of something breaking. You do it carefully and infrequently. > > > > -- > > Cheers > John > > -- spambait > 1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ > > do not reply off-list > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > if you cant handle it on servers you certainly shouldnt use it there. it is successfully in production use though on various big projects/sites. regards, rudolf kastl
