Ahh symantics :) Nobody has used 32-bit chips for about a decade so it's pretty safe to assume I mean 64-bit. The new T1 CPUs would be a preferred platform over IA64 I'm sure?! On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 12:57 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > Naoki wrote: > > Not wanting to start anything here but.. wouldn't sparc be much more > > useful (wanted, widespread) than ia64? ;) > > Ultrasparc is 64-bit Sparc from Sun > Sparc64 is similar, from Fujitsu. > TI is in there somewhere too, but I think only as a CPU & chipset > manufacturer. > > "sparc" generally means 32-bit CPUs. They're faily old. >
