Re: vulnerability of Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 14:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Rodolfo Alcazar wrote:
> 
> > - Have updated systems! update your system daily. Yum must program your
> > yum or apt updates to run at least daily.
> 
> Respectfully, this sounds like a recipe for disaster. I update
> my system about once a month.

I used to think that way. Starting daily updates, and knowing hoy to
reverse an update, gave me the kickstart to try daily updating. Now
thats a stable procedure here.

Whats the criteria for a monthly update? Now you are taking the risk of
having (worst-case) 29-days/ 1-day(best case) security holes, why not
update every 2, 6, 12 months? 29 or 1 day, say average 14, its enough
time to infect your servers (do not forget this thread's subject:
somebody asked how to protect himself against linux vulnerabilities).

> Mike
> -- 
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You have found the bank of Larn.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
> 
--
Rodolfo Alcazar - rodolfo.alcazar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Netzmanager Padep, GTZ
591-70656800, -22417628, LA PAZ, BOLIVIA
http://otbits.blogspot.com
--
I will live forever, or die trying.



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux