On 11/18/05, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 17 November 2005 23:53, Wong Kwok-hon wrote: > >On 11/17/05, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> James Wilkinson wrote: > >> > Warren Togami wrote: > >> >>Effective immediately I am not allowing any @uol.com.br > >> >> subscriptions to fedora-list. It seems that people who post to > >> >> the list are getting spammed from uol.com.br. This is not the > >> >> first time this has happened. > >> > > >> > Note that there is still a petsupermarket@xxxxxxxxxx subscribed to > >> > the list (maybe under a different address) and sending > >> > "confirmation" e-mails. > >> > > >> > Actually, it just sent me *four* confirmation e-mails, so I imagine > >> > that the twit's been wondering why he isn't getting any of his > >> > Fedora list e-mails, and has tried resubscribing multiple times. > >> > > >> > James (editing his .procmailrc) > >> > >> It seems to be even stupider than this. If you don't respond to the > >> uol.com.br bounce, it re-sends it every 2 hours. This is some > >> horribly broken stupidity for a lage ISP. I wonder of our IS folks > >> would mind just blacklisting the entire domain at the SMTP level... > > > >But I found that the .br site sending me email for 4 hours with 15mins > > interval > > > >Wong Kwok Hon > > We may be getting somewhere with this. Its harrassing the debian list > too, and one customer of this ISP suggested we in turn harrass a regular > list of addresses, so I'm forwarding everything I get to: > abuse@xxxxxxxxxx, uol@xxxxxxxxxx, security@xxxxxxxxxx, > mail-abuse@xxxxxxx > > Just for effects mind you, and I'm adding a header line X-Clueless Twit > with a value of SPAMMER :) > > As usual though, no response. Warrens actions seems to have pretty > well slowed the flood here. > > -- > Cheers, Gene Therefore I set a filter to make them to the trash bin when I got. :) Wong Kwok Hon
