Re: LDAP vs. NIS+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Aly Dharshi wrote:

LDAP is hands down the way to go, even Sun says that NIS+ maybe deprecated in future releases, its a freaking pain in the ass. NIS+ is no being actively developed for Linux, NIS+ is a good exercise in self-inflicted pain (which I will have to go thru' starting 2morrow).

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:

Once again I turn to the smart folks on this list. I'm looking for a way to centralize our user management. At the moment I have user logins that are scattered across several machines. Ideally I want to have one central "accounts" machine, where all the user LOGIN data is kept and maintained. Then I would have a shell server, where their actual files are kept. Users then connect to this shell server only (which then authenticates the user against the "accounts" machine before letting them on.) I will also have a web server and mail spool server which will have NFS shares, and all of these will have to have some record of the user information (UID/GID at the very least) for things to work properly. That data should be coming from the central "accounts" machine I would think.

I heard that NIS+ can do what I want to do. At the same time, I also heard LDAP may be what I want. So which is which? What should I consider using? Considering that neither is something I've played with extensively (I've done some NIS+ stuff eons ago, but never LDAP) this would be a first for me and having to figure things out from the ground up.

What does the general public recommend? And any pointers/suggestions you might have are also welcome.

I found NIS not all that bad, considering the work involved integrating all your services to use LDAP, it may not be all that bad if your needs are simple.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux