Ed Swierk wrote: > My guess is that anaconda decided not to upgrade certain updated FC3 > packages whose FC4 counterparts had lower version numbers. > > Have others run into this problem? I would like to help my colleagues > avoid the same mess when they upgrade. Yeah I saw it when downgrading from the development branch on one machine. Can you compare, say, rpm -qa | grep glibc to the glibc* on FC4 base, eg glibc-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 4.2M glibc-2.3.5-10.i686.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 5.7M glibc-common-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 14M glibc-devel-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 1.9M glibc-headers-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 594K glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.94.i386.rpm 20-May-2005 14:36 706K glibc-profile-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 1.1M glibc-utils-2.3.5-10.i386.rpm 30-May-2005 16:16 98K -Andy
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
