On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:12 -0500, Tony Nelson wrote: > At 3:26 PM -0500 11/7/05, Nat Gross wrote: > >Yep. I assumed that -y was for updates only. > >Anyhow, how do you go about without the -y option? Sit and wait for 50 > >updates? (I must admit, all the time I save with -y is out the window > >today.) > > Perhaps you should bugzilla yum with a RFE on this, that it would be useful > to have a way to say "yes" just to updates. ---- it was an update, it just happened to be dependency from amarok that was the problem. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
