kwhiskers wrote:
On 03/11/05, *Steven Stromer* <filter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:filter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>I want
>>>to create a self-signed CA cert, which is most easily achieved
using the
>>>ca.pl script. This is no longer anywhere to be found, along with the
>>>demoCA folder that one would normally expect to find. Can anyone
shed
>>>some light on where these files ended up? I can't find them on a
search.
>>The perl script is in the openssl-perl package. The original
split was
>>needed to keep the openssl package from depending on perl, which
isn't
>>part of the "Base" package component/group.
>>
>>It looks like the generated data files would now be placed in
/etc/CA,
>>but of course that's configurable in openssl.cnf.
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>Nalin
> It seems to me that certificates can be created using :
> /etc/pki/tls/certs/Makefile
> -------------------------------------------
> Aaron Konstam
Thank you all for your replies. I was aware of the line:
'OpenSSL: the /usr/share/ssl contents have moved to /etc/pki/tls and
/etc/pki/CA.'
in FC4's Release Notes. However, within the new path, there are many
files missing that were available in the old path.
Nalin helped to explain some of the missing files by documenting that
openssl and openssl-perl are seperate packages. That helps to explain
some of the missing script files.
Before learning this I manually executed all of the commnands I needed
to create my CA and host certificates and keys using openssl commands,
which are easier to use, in my opinion, than the perl scripts that
exist
to help in these steps. But, that's just a matter of opinion, and I
understand that there are a number of scripts that perform very
convenient file conversion, that I may find myself reaching for sometime
in the future.
For the moment, I've skipped installing the openssl-perl package, just
to keep life as simple as possible (less to learn, secure, and just deal
with!).
The Makefile is also very helpful for at least creating a pem styled
csr
(make certreq).
However, this is where the remaining missing files and directories come
into play. I want to sign my newly minted request with my own CA cert,
but I am getting errors having to do with the configuration of
openssl.cnf. There seem to be a number of 'mistakes' in the CA_default
section of the configuration file. The first attribute 'dir', has a
value of '../../CA', which seems faulty to me. Worse, a few lines
later,
the 'crl_dir', 'serial', 'crl' and a number of other attributes have
values that point to directories and files that simply DO NOT EXIST!
I have attempted to create some of the missing directories, which gets
me past the first few errors when executing:
openssl ca -config /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf -policy policy_anything -out
www.domainname.com.pem -infiles www.domainname.com.request.pem
but, eventually I get to errors relating to the missing files (ie.
index.txt) and I grind to a halt.
Has anyone successfully created CA and signed their own certs using a
'default' installation of FC4? Did you have to take any extraordinary
steps to achieve this?
Thanks everyone for the responses. Sorry this is more involved than it
first seemed.
Steven Stromer
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
I am waiting with bated breath for the answer.
I had created a certificate manually, with openssl pkcs
somethingorother, which generated the certificate and imported
successfully into konqueror, firefox and mozilla.
This morning, I discovered the makefile in /etc/pki/certs and tried make
certificatename.pem and that worked also.
I have placed these certificates into every directory I can think of in
the /etc/pki tree, as well as having imported them into the
aforementioned programs.
I am unable to use these certificates to sign a document in open office,
however.
As for your problem, I cannotoffer any more information, but I feel that
the solutions are allied.
It would seem that signing a certificate should be a fairly
straightforward, and common action; al least common enough for some list
readers to be able to say 'yes, I can do this without a problem in FC4',
or 'no, I'm experiencing the same problems'. I am becoming more and more
convinced that this is an issue of misconfiguration of the present
openssl package, which might warrant a bug listing. There is some
interesting, and very good, documentation on openssl.cfg at:
http://www.technoids.org/openssl.cnf.html
It has helped me to understand better what is failing to work, some of
which I described in an earlier posting in this thread. There are now a
few people needing help here! Any brains in shining armor around?
Thanks again!
Steven Stromer
