David L. Gehrt wrote: >>> If you have a seriously disrupted serial number. Setting the serial >>> number to "0" and propagating it will allow you to get the slaves back >>> in sync. Tim: >> Hmm, this isn't something I've heard mentioned before. Does it have a >> defined purpose? Les Mikesell: > Yes, the slaves won't update their copy of the zones unless > the serial number increases on the primary. I know *that*, I'm referring to the suggestion of setting the serial number to zero. -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.