Hi, I found the following file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171692 from fedora people website https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171692 which seems to suggest a work around for this problem Regards, Rajesh Tarjei Knapstad wrote: > On 11/3/05, Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote: >> > On 11/3/05, Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Tarjei Knapstad wrote: >> > > > Sounds like it might be an OOo problem then, I find it pretty >> > > > annoying that the OOo documentation doesn't specify what you're >> > > > supposed to point to when adding a JRE... >> > > >> > > I'm pretty sure that the Fedora version of OO.o is patched to work >> > > with >> > > the GNU runtime. This may make it incompatible with other JVM's. >> > > >> > > You might try removing the Fedora packages and downloading the >> > > upstream version. >> > > >> > >> > Ah, I see. Thanks. >> > >> > According to Charles Curley it doesn't work if you install the >> > upstream RPM's from OOo either though, so it might be something >> > else... >> >> What I tried and which did not work was finding the jpackage (fc4 >> native) JRE with the upstream OOo RPMs. >> >> Indeed, on my laptop I have the upstream OOo RPMs and Sun's >> jdk-1.5.0_01-fcs RPM, and the upstream OOo finds the JRE. So Ian is >> correct. >> > > OK, thanks for the info Charles! > > -- > Tarjei >
