On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote: > On 11/3/05, Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tarjei Knapstad wrote: > > > Sounds like it might be an OOo problem then, I find it pretty annoying > > > that the OOo documentation doesn't specify what you're supposed to > > > point to when adding a JRE... > > > > I'm pretty sure that the Fedora version of OO.o is patched to work with > > the GNU runtime. This may make it incompatible with other JVM's. > > > > You might try removing the Fedora packages and downloading the upstream > > version. > > > > Ah, I see. Thanks. > > According to Charles Curley it doesn't work if you install the > upstream RPM's from OOo either though, so it might be something > else... What I tried and which did not work was finding the jpackage (fc4 native) JRE with the upstream OOo RPMs. Indeed, on my laptop I have the upstream OOo RPMs and Sun's jdk-1.5.0_01-fcs RPM, and the upstream OOo finds the JRE. So Ian is correct. > > -- > Tarjei > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
Attachment:
pgpXr4TPIROUV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
