At 12:55 PM -0500 11/2/05, Derek Martin wrote: >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H" >Content-Disposition: inline > >On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Robert Locke wrote: >> I've been trying to ignore this thread, but Derek, >> >> Next time try clicking on the link that Rahul provided (before >> assuming), which just to repeat was: > >Well, I don't mean to be rude, but simply put, no. If one were to >follow every link that someone posted in a thread they were >participating in, they would never leave the computer. There would be >time for nothing else in the day. Now that you've made foolish posts on this twice, I will tell you /do/ /not/ /respond/ /to/ /posts/ /you/ /haven't/ /read/. If you don't read a post you have no place posting a response. Or two. >If you want people to read links that you post, it would be helpful if >you provided some clue as to what information is there, and/or why you >want them to look at it. If you don't want to do that, fine... but >you shouldn't expect that people will necessarily follow your links >either. Get a clue yourself or /be/ /quiet/. ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
