I have moved the discussion, which has been resolved (you can read the solution), to another thread, called "mass storage... automounting in light of experimentation, consultation..." No, mine all automount, in the newly learned definition of automounting, exactly as to be expected. Unfortunately, I couldn't even begin to conjecture why yours no longer work, but here are some lay guesses... Did you make any configurations/modifications? Not update the software to most recent? Use incompatible rpms from other repos or even distros? Or even, heaven forbid, not using FC4? Once again, I would like to close this thread, as it has wound down, and consolidate it on the other one, so that discussion remains together. Thanks. On 10/27/05, Marcus Zingmark <blackline@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > kwhiskers skrev: > > > Has anyone had to modify the HAL mass storage device description for > > HAL, those .fdi files hiding in /usr/share/hal, I think? > > > > My digital camera, which is automatically detected by Fedora, loads > > the modules, and I get /dev/sda1 created, does hot mount automatically. > > > > I am sure this has to do with the property/description files used by HAL. > > > > Anyone have ideas? > > > > The camera uses scsi, subtype sd, I think, block device, etc. (I am > > not home now, so can't remember all the details) > > > > Leads, anyone? > > > > There is an article in January 2005 redhat magazine, but it is rather > > complicated and not specific to my problem,, but it provides some clues. > > Actually all my USB-devices that have been automounted before have > stopped doing that, but I can mount manually. Sounds like the same problem. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
