Robin Laing wrote: > Why not automate the packages to be the latest? Isn't this what > computers are supposed to be good at? How hard would it be to make a > bi-weekly package. Release the packages as FCx.yymmdd The ISO's would > just be created from the current packages. The date code provides users > to know the date of the image. And how many mirrors want to transfer an extra ~12 GB bi-weekly? That's just for the ISOs. Double that for the exploded trees. And how many people want to test these ISO sets bi-weekly to make sure no bugs have creeped in? And how long does the none-technical side of creating new ISOs take? In the past ISOs have been ready a week early, but were waiting on non-technical issues. -- William Hooper
