Tim wrote: > The whole Fedora approach of rushing out major changes to releases on a > certain date for the sake of a schedule has proved itself to be a stupid > idea. I don't *need* to be rebuilding the entire OS on several PCs that We should entertain the idea that this was not in fact decided in the expectation of your personal needs... RHAT have said pretty clearly that Fedora is for them a way to gain experience and feedback with newer stuff so that integration of it into RHEL will go smoothly. That's the Fedora deal, and it explains how some really good guys at RHAT can spend all day every day on it, to us, for free. Having some kind of deadline, despite issues it can cause, in my experience is beneficial in focusing minds and clarifying the mission as it were. Having said that, yeah, broken install action is pretty major. > often, and I certainly don't want to. I'm now looking at using > something else, instead. One of the BSDs is looking favourable to me. Go for it, dude! Or consider using a RHEL-u-like, eg, CentOS or Whitebox, which have the RHEL release pattern. Use what suits you best. -Andy
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
