Re: question re list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 25/10/05, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:10 -0600, kwhiskers wrote:

>
> Just since writing these last 2 emails on this thread, 2 Brazilian
> antispam mails arrived that seem to be part of this thread. This is
> very odd. There seem to be a lot of spammers on this list. I use this
> account only for redhat, nowhere else, and have never mentioned it
> anywhere else and my spambox is filled to overflowing with mostly
> Chinese spam since I have registered with this redhat list. My other
> gmail accounts never receive any at all and they are known in some
> yahoo forums.
----
yeah - if you are referring to petsupermarket - that is similar/almost
identical to peter whalley threads from some time back and that is some
registered account on this list. That seemingly just started but long
time users of this list have seen this before.

Chinese spam - I don't know if that has anything to do with this list.

Craig


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Yeah, I get the Chinese spam all the time (quite a few per day), but google sees it correctly and puts it into the spam directory. I remember those peter whalleys. Endless. Have they stopped? But now there's this. I haven't been on this list for a few months. Had this problem I was unable to solve by myself, thought instead of staying up all night, I'd just ask around and see if I could finally get this solved once and for all.

Sorry to bother, but it was worth a try. I have learned a whole lot from the posts here for things I wasn't even concerned with, and then I saw something, which steered me to something else... et voilà, I was ble to improve something I had never thought of before.

Anyway, the scsi problem seems to have been registered as a redhat bug, but that was back in Fedora 2, I think. I thought it would likely have long since been taken care of...

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux