Re: Defrag.

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Defrag.
• From: Strong <s-strong@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 22:05:26 +0700
• In-reply-to: <1128606496.13225.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <1128589892.2829.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1128606496.13225.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: s-strong@xxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 23:18 +0930, Tim wrote:
> As Andy said, the need for defragging isn't there.
How is it if when checked it says there are fragmentation, unorganized
or whatever?

-- 
Best regards,
Strong.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Defrag.
    • From: Dave Mitchell

• References:
  • Defrag.
    • From: harry weston
  • Re: Defrag.
    • From: Tim

• Prev by Date: Samba readonly !
• Next by Date: Re: Problem with kernel patch
• Previous by thread: Re: Defrag.
• Next by thread: Re: Defrag.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread