Re: XEN: how "stable" is it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Roger Grosswiler wrote:

>hey,
>
>i think about throwing away some pc's and moving their function to another
>device with xen. i tried to install older version - they never worked for
>me.
>
>how about the latest version of xen and dom0 and domu for the newer
>kernel? do they work? has already somebody collect some experience with
>xen and fc4?
>
>Thanks
>Roger
>
>  
>
Just hopped to the bandwagon and immediately run into trouble:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169157

If you try, you will save valuable time by downloading rpms from a link
mentioned in that bug. I tried several combination of kernels and Xens
before this and none of them worked.

I have managed to get one virtual machine running but I can not say that
I am impressed:
- xm reboot kills xend-service
- xm shutdown causes xm list to blurt out errors at the first invocation
- xend start causes errors from xend script itself that are network
related...
- you can easily shoot to your leg with memory. Just tried to squeeze
dom0 memory to minimum setting, forgot doing that and started a kernel
build on domain 0 to just freeze the whole shebang. Too little memory on
dom1 will cause your virtual machine halt and again causes xm to blurt
out errors at the first invocation afterwards. It can also take out
xend-service with it.

But I'm still testing...



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux