> You need a digest that has the entire message > (headers, too), which > negates the idea of cutting e-mail volume, and a > client that could break > them apart (again, negating the your reason for > using a digest). Hmm, point taken. This is a bit different to a Yahoo-based email group that I run, where I take stuff as digest. Users can also take individual messages, and/or not take messages at all and read it via the web-based archives. Replying can be achieved from reading a message on the web-based archive, or by replying to an individual message. For now I will switch to individual messages, but could someone with admin access to all the mailman lists put a warning on the options page to say you lose the ability to reply properly to digest mail? Note that I read it at yahoo.com.au, and when reading, I have to wait for a round-trip delay on each message, rather than once per digest (yahoo does spit out rather a lot for each message you read). Of course, this message won't thread properly, but this should be one of the last. Nick Bishop, email replies ignored. ----- Disclaimer, n: Advice to the reader that they should put their lawyer away. -oOo- ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere Photos and full Actor Database. http://au.movies.yahoo.com
