Tim wrote: >> Usually, the warnings about things like how some document >> formats mightn't support some styling effects, might not do tabs or >> margins in the same way, etc. Guy Fraser: > Precisely why a standard format was needed. Oh, I agree. One of the things I liked about the concept of HTML was a document that could be read on nearly anything. Of course we all know who buggered that up. Mostly one organisation, though their main competitor was just about as bad. My personal computer background was pre-Windows. I remember the plethora of different personal computers, with almost no possibility of data interchange between them. At first, Windows seemed hopeful, but they just never got the idea of what "compatible" meant (not even within themselves). I still have word processor documents stored in about 6 or 7 unreadable formats on various discs. About my only chance of conversion, with layout, is scanning and OCR. If I just wanted content, and didn't mind re-laying out the content, I could save as plain text. It really is a stupid situation to still be in. -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
