On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:39 +0100, Paul Smith wrote: > On 9/29/05, Sharon Kimble <sharonm63@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Resolving Dependencies > > > --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. > > > ---> Package mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 set to be updated > > > --> Running transaction check > > > --> Processing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 for package: transcode > > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 is needed by package > > > transcode > > > > > I see that livna has transcode 1.0.0-0.lvn.3.3 in their unstable repo since > > 28th September, so its obviously being tested out. > > Then, if mjpegtools depends on a unstable transcode version, it would > have been wiser not having made mjpegtools.i386 0:1.8.0-0.lvn.1.4 > available on the stable repository. > > Paul > You are reading that backwards. Transcode depends on libmjpegtools not the other way around. The transcode package installed specifically requires libmjpegutils-1.7.so.0 and since the libmjpegutils library is being updated and would remove that file, it fails because doing so would break the installed dependency. This may be a transcode issue for requiring an explicit library file, but appears to be related to the installed version, not the unstable/testing version.
