Re: X.org's DRI vs. ATi's Proprietary driver (Was: "Re: ATI Livna driver package (Something has changed)")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:17 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> the video performance is visibly better on some of the more complex 
> screen savers with the ATI-fglrx driver then with the one built in to
> the 
> kernel.
Does anybody know, Why nvidia 3D-graphics support is excluded from the
default kernel, as opposed to ATI-ones?

-- 
Best regards,
Strong.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux