>> IN MY PC THE SOUND IS NOT DETECTED IN FEDORA CORE 3 ON 915
INTEL ORIGENAL MOTHERBOARD .
>>WHAT CAN I DO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM.
>>IF THERE IS ANY SOLUTION THEN SEND ME ON THE SAME EMAIL ID.
>>THANKA U.
--------------------------------------------
ravikumar.sggs@xxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------
On 9/20/05, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
<fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: How to detect image size? (gb spam)
> 2. Re: installing Fedora w/o booting from CD (Mike McCarty)
> 3. Re: Error (Mike McCarty)
> 4. No Suspend on 1450? (david@xxxxxxxxx)
> 5. Audio .au File Player (Mike McCarty)
> 6. Re: No Suspend on 1450? (Peter Teuben)
> 7. RE: static DNS record and DHCP (Steve Zeng)
> 8. Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system (Alex Janssen)
> 9. Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system (Jim Cornette)
> 10. RE: Samba / Windows Server 2003 SP1 Conflict (Timothy A. Holmes)
> 11. FC4 Gnome F10 key binding (AragonX)
> 12. Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding (Jim Cornette)
> 13. Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding (Jim Cornette)
> 14. Re: [solved] shell scripting error (qmail related) (Gezim Hoxha)
> 15. Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system (Alex Janssen)
> 16. Re: Help with Script that sends out HTML emails [SOLVED-Agn]
> (Ow Mun Heng)
> 17. Re: Help with Script that sends out HTML emails [SOLVED-Agn]
> (Sam Varshavchik)
> 18. Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding (Amadeus W. M.)
> 19. Change default pdf viewer in thunderbird? (Orion Poplawski)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:35:18 -0400
> From: gb spam <gbofspam@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: How to detect image size?
> To: s-strong@xxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <6c3f5e6c050919153553cf6e2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 9/19/05, Strong <s-strong@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have a huge of imges (jpg, bmp, gif) in a huge dirs/subdirs. I want to
> > remove those whose height/width is less, say 500 pixels. I looked at
> > ImageMagic programs but didn't find one that offers such info. I suppose
> > it should be one-two-line bash script. Does anyone knows how to do that?
>
> identify (from image magik) gives the dimensions, you just need to do
> a few gynastics to get the output in a form that is useful.
>
> adjust the follow to suit your needs:
>
> find . -name '*.jpg' | xargs -l1 identify -ping | awk '{FILE=$1;
> sub("[[].*", "", FILE); X=$3; sub("x.*", "", X); Y=$3; sub(".*x", "",
> Y); if ((X<500) || (Y<500)) printf("%s : %ix%i\n", FILE, X, Y)}'
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:36:01 -0500
> From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: installing Fedora w/o booting from CD
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F3D51.9050802@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> vincent fail wrote:
> > I want to install fedora on a old pc that doesn't have
> > an option setting in the bios that allows the pc to
> > boot from a CD.
> >
> > How I can install Fedora without being able to boot
> > from the CD and preferably, not having to upgrade the
> > bios?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
> I have used and liked this:
>
> http://btmgr.webframe.org/index.php3
>
> It works great with my old 486 machine.
>
> Mike
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You have found the bank of Larn.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:46:19 -0500
> From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Error
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F3FBB.7090708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Homero Briozzo wrote:
>
> I'll translate...
>
> I saw a reply which said it was a PHP script error, but he says
> it works under Suse 9.0, so anyway...
>
> > Estimados amigos ,
>
> Dear friends,
>
> >
> > Tengo una aplicación que sobre Suse 9.0, php4, mysql 3.2 me funciona
> perfecto.
>
> I have an application on Suse 9.0, php4, mysql 3.2 which works
> perfectly for me.
>
> > Si esa misma aplicación la corro en otro equipo que tiene instalado lo
> siguiente:
>
> If I run the same application on other equipment on which I have
> installed the following:
>
> > Versiones:
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > PHP 4.3.8
> >
> > phpMyAdmin 2.6.3
> >
> > MySQL 3.23.58-4
> >
> > Apache 2.0.50
> >
> >
> >
> > Fedora Core 2
> >
> > Kernel 2.4.22
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Me da este error :
>
> It gives me this error:
>
> > Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in
> /var/www/html/ipplanv6/ipv6/displaycustomer.php on line 87
> >
> >
> >
> > Uds. me podrian orientar ?
>
> Could y'all direct me?
>
> > Muchas gracias,
> >
> >
> >
> > Saludos cordials
> >
> > Homero
>
> Mike
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You have found the bank of Larn.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: david@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: No Suspend on 1450?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <39101.69.3.5.135.1127171179.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> For whatever reason, when I tossed kernel 2.6.12-1.1450_FC4 onto my
> computer using the RPMs in testing, I didn't get a /sys/power/disk to try
> using suspend with. Any ideas or suggestions? I am indeed running the
> appropriate kernel:
>
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.12-1.1450_FC4 #1 Fri Sep 2 18:45:01 EDT
> 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
>
> I would love to give suspend a workout, since my laptop doesn't have any
> valuable info on it, and it's a very new model.
>
> -DMZ
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:17:49 -0500
> From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Audio .au File Player
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F471D.4010009@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I did a Google, and found a few, but was unable to ascertain
> which, if any, of the possible players for the .au format
> would do well with FCx/Gnome.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Mike
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You have found the bank of Larn.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Peter Teuben <teuben@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: No Suspend on 1450?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0509191920000.12732-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> > For whatever reason, when I tossed kernel 2.6.12-1.1450_FC4 onto my
> > computer using the RPMs in testing, I didn't get a /sys/power/disk to try
> > using suspend with. Any ideas or suggestions? I am indeed running the
> > appropriate kernel:
> >
> > Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.12-1.1450_FC4 #1 Fri Sep 2 18:45:01 EDT
> > 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> >
>
>
> same problem here, at least for 1447 the last one i've used.
> So, i've been sticking to 1398 for now.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:35:27 -0700
> From: "Steve Zeng" <steve.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: static DNS record and DHCP
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1500445CEE4DE54AAE37A4F1E730FED90E5BF2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tim
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:15 AM
> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> > Subject: Re: static DNS record and DHCP
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:51 -0700, Steve Zeng wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone give me some clue on this problem?
> > >
> > > I got DHCP 3.0.1 and BIND 9.2.3 configured on Fedora Core 3 to work
> > > with Windows 2003 Active Directory. When I manually add some static
> > > hosts into DNS zone file, it is deleted automatically after a while.
> > > How can I keep them from being removed? I need some static IPs for
> > > servers.
> >
> > Are the static IPs outside of the range used by DHCP?
>
> Yes. It is out of the range controlled by DHCP.
>
> >
> > Did you stop the DNS server and remove the journal (.jnl) files before
> > adding in your static addresses?
>
> Why do I need to delete .jnl files? Could you point me to some
> documentations about this?
> I appreciate it.
>
> >
> > You can preset your DHCP server to assign fixed IPs to some hosts,
> > that's another way of doing it. See the man file for details, but you
> > can identify a machine to give a fixed IP to by hostname or MAC.
> >
> > e.g. Something *like* this in the DHCP configuration file:
> >
> > host fixme {
> > hardware ethernet 00:00:21:25:92:fb;
> > fixed-address 192.168.1.180;
> > option host-name "fixme";
> > update-static-leases on;
> > }
> >
> >
> > > my /etc/dhcpd.conf is as follows:
> > >
> > > key rndc-key {
> > > algorithm hmac-md5;
> > > secret "8mTgBumsU7SEaYkDvE2RvBVYUtwPQCdg/CHV/v2pOGM";
> > > }
> >
> > No longer "secret", change it if that's important to you.
> >
> > --
> > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
> > I read messages from the public lists.
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:52:39 -0400
> From: Alex Janssen <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F4F47.1030208@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Jim Cornette said the following on 9/19/2005 7:10 AM:
>
> > It looks to me by your results that the older package is intact and
> > that rpm thinks that the only difference during verification is the
> > particular LibGLU.so.1.3 version.
> > In other words, The new package is not actually present on the system,
> > the older package is installed on the system. Both versions are in the
> > rpm database though. To make upgrading your system easier whenever X
> > is fixed and a new release comes out, removing the db entry for the
> > newer version might be needed.
> >
> > Interesting information about the script breakage. This is surely a
> > problem.
> >
> This surely is a problem. For me too. Anyone figured out how a newby
> no-nothing could repair this? I've been trying to figure this out since
> Saturday. Do you think X.org will re-issue the update so it will fix
> itself if I just do "yum -update xorg-x11*"? Or is it going to be more
> complicated?
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Ourwoods.org
> Charlottesville, Virginia
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:18:56 -0400
> From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F5570.6020200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Alex Janssen wrote:
>
> > Jim Cornette said the following on 9/19/2005 7:10 AM:
> >
> >> It looks to me by your results that the older package is intact and
> >> that rpm thinks that the only difference during verification is the
> >> particular LibGLU.so.1.3 version.
> >> In other words, The new package is not actually present on the
> >> system, the older package is installed on the system. Both versions
> >> are in the rpm database though. To make upgrading your system easier
> >> whenever X is fixed and a new release comes out, removing the db
> >> entry for the newer version might be needed.
> >>
> >> Interesting information about the script breakage. This is surely a
> >> problem.
> >>
> > This surely is a problem. For me too. Anyone figured out how a newby
> > no-nothing could repair this? I've been trying to figure this out
> > since Saturday. Do you think X.org will re-issue the update so it
> > will fix itself if I just do "yum -update xorg-x11*"? Or is it going
> > to be more complicated?
>
> This would be an ideal solution. Changing your video driver from i810 to
> vesa and living with the lesser graphics quality is probably best for
> right now, since security is at risk with backdating.
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> Just to post on the security announcement on the xorg list, a link is
> below.
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-September/010082.html
>
> For my gripes to the xorg list, see the link below.
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-September/010091.html
>
> Jim
>
> --
> QOTD:
> If it's too loud, you're too old.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:23:36 -0400
> From: "Timothy A. Holmes" <tholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Samba / Windows Server 2003 SP1 Conflict
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <17CD9CE4C0FA574A8B29EF02D49B385D2EA4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig White
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 6:26 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: Samba / Windows Server 2003 SP1 Conflict
>
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:46 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> > Hi Folks:
> >
> > It seems that there is a problem with samba and Server 2003 SP1. When
> > SP1 Installs, samba stops authenticating in ADS mode, and causes
> > considerable heartburn. The research that I have found (dated April
> of
> > this year) seems to indicate that it is a problem with samba
> > communicating with the Kerbros server using a protocol called schannel
> > (I hope im getting this straight, Our domain controller crashed, and I
> > have lost my history to go back to the sources that I found).
> >
> > Is there a work around other than not using SP1, I seem to remember
> > that one of the sources that I saw indicated a command to be included
> in
> > the smb.conf file, but I cannot find it readily. Can someone please
> > enlighten me as to how to get this working???
> >
> > Thank you so much for your time and trouble
> ----
> wasn't this just answered on samba list?
>
> Craig
>
> Craig:
>
> Indeed it has - I sent it both places simultaneously to try to get the
> broadest possible coverage -- thanks very much
>
> TIM
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:02:23 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "AragonX" <aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <3077.10.1.1.1.1127178143.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> In FC4, the F10 key is bound to bring up the menubar. How do I get rid of
> this? I use MC a lot and need the F10 key. lol
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:19:26 -0400
> From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F639E.9000008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> AragonX wrote:
>
> >In FC4, the F10 key is bound to bring up the menubar. How do I get rid of
> >this? I use MC a lot and need the F10 key. lol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> To disable the key in the GNOME terminal (F10 shortcut)
> go to the menu, select keyboard shortcuts, then check disable menu
> shortcut key (F10 by default)
> using mc a lot also is why I disable the menu shortcut myself.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> QOTD:
> If it's too loud, you're too old.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:21:23 -0400
> From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F6413.608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Jim Cornette wrote:
>
> > AragonX wrote:
> >
> >> In FC4, the F10 key is bound to bring up the menubar. How do I get
> >> rid of
> >> this? I use MC a lot and need the F10 key. lol
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > To disable the key in the GNOME terminal (F10 shortcut)
> > Go to the *edit* menu, select keyboard shortcuts, then check disable
> > menu shortcut key (F10 by default)
> > using mc a lot also is why I disable the menu shortcut myself.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> forgot edit menu.
>
> --
> QOTD:
> If it's too loud, you're too old.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:24:40 -0600
> From: Gezim Hoxha <gezimetc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [solved] shell scripting error (qmail related)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1127179480.5773.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 16:37 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> > When I cut and paste the above script into 'od -c', I see that the
> > '-' characters are not simple ASCII characters but a 3-byte sequence
> > "\342\210\222" in octal. That explains what you are seeing. How
> > on Earth they got that way is another question altogether.
>
> Actually, what I did, was copy the script from Evince and into vi, so
> that's how the - characters got all wacky. The solution was, to just
> type it out.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> -Gezim
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:37:52 -0400
> From: Alex Janssen <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: xorg-x11 update may have broken my system
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <432F67F0.4020204@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Jim Cornette said the following on 9/19/2005 8:18 PM:
>
> > Alex Janssen wrote:
> >
> >> Jim Cornette said the following on 9/19/2005 7:10 AM:
> >>
> >>> It looks to me by your results that the older package is intact and
> >>> that rpm thinks that the only difference during verification is the
> >>> particular LibGLU.so.1.3 version.
> >>> In other words, The new package is not actually present on the
> >>> system, the older package is installed on the system. Both versions
> >>> are in the rpm database though. To make upgrading your system
> >>> easier whenever X is fixed and a new release comes out, removing
> >>> the db entry for the newer version might be needed.
> >>>
> >>> Interesting information about the script breakage. This is surely a
> >>> problem.
> >>>
> >> This surely is a problem. For me too. Anyone figured out how a
> >> newby no-nothing could repair this? I've been trying to figure this
> >> out since Saturday. Do you think X.org will re-issue the update so
> >> it will fix itself if I just do "yum -update xorg-x11*"? Or is it
> >> going to be more complicated?
> >
> >
> > This would be an ideal solution. Changing your video driver from i810
> > to vesa and living with the lesser graphics quality is probably best
> > for right now, since security is at risk with backdating.
> >
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> > Just to post on the security announcement on the xorg list, a link is
> > below.
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-September/010082.html
> >
> > For my gripes to the xorg list, see the link below.
> >
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2005-September/010091.html
> >
> > Jim
> >
> I just want to get my graphics interface back. I don't care who did
> what to who for ...
> Why don't they test this stuff before they distribute it?
> Everything was going great. I was showing off linux(FC3) to all my
> friends and now I'm trying to hide it. I tell 'em, I'm to busy right
> now to show it to you, come back later, like next week. I hope I can
> get this fixed before then.
> Somebody post a fix! Please. I was actually using linux more than
> windows xp for once and now this! Well, I know FC is a test bed. I
> probably should switch to a more managed distro. I don't think I can
> stomach this... I think I'm going to hurl ... mmm mmm ...
> I just did "yum install xorg-x11*", it dl'd some modules and installed
> them, but X was still crippled.
> Is there any way to back up?
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Ourwoods.org
> Charlottesville, Virginia
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:46:16 +0800
> From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Help with Script that sends out HTML emails [SOLVED-Agn]
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1127180776.25800.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:52 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 22:44 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > >> > > I'm writing a bash script that basically checks for
> stocks
> > > >> > > prices and I
> > > >> > > want the formatted output to be mailed to me. I've got the
> script
> >
> > > >> mail -a "Content-Type: text/html"
> > > >
> > > > Okay.. for some reason, FC3's version of mailx (8.1.33) does not have
> > > > the "-a" option to mail.
>
> > > You can format the entire mail message yourself, and pipe it to
> sendmail.
> > >
> > > Consider this as an opportunity for you to learn about proper E-mail
> > > formats.
> >
> > Believe it or not, I've actually done this before, but using mail -a
> > would have been a simpler matter comparatively. :-(
>
>
> Done..
>
> I added a mail_header to my script that does..
> mail_header()
> {
> echo "MIME-Version:1.0"
> echo "From:No-Reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx"
> echo "To:$RECIPIENT"
> echo "Subject:Quotes $DATE"
> echo "Content-Type: text/html"
> echo
> }
>
> and then I added a script for cron
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> TEMPFILE="/tmp/file.$$"
> PORTFOLIO_SCRIPT=$HOME/scripts/portfolio.sh
>
> $PORTFOLIO_SCRIPT --html > $TEMPFILE 2>/dev/null>&1
> && /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < $TEMPFILE && rm $TEMPFILE
>
> Next, I think the above code can be enhanced by not using a tempfile.
> perhaps a < EOF
>
>
>
> --
> Ow Mun Heng
> Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
> 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
> Neuromancer 09:43:41 up 1 day, 1 min, 6 users, load average: 2.44, 2.13,
> 2.20
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:26:54 -0400
> From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Help with Script that sends out HTML emails [SOLVED-Agn]
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <cone.1127183214.482222.25517.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ow Mun Heng writes:
>
> >
> > $PORTFOLIO_SCRIPT --html > $TEMPFILE 2>/dev/null>&1
> > && /usr/sbin/sendmail -t < $TEMPFILE && rm $TEMPFILE
> >
> > Next, I think the above code can be enhanced by not using a tempfile.
> > perhaps a < EOF
>
> Use a pipe:
>
> $PORTFOLIO_SCRIPT --html | /usr/sbin/sendmail -t
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050919/36c573bf/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:23:37 -0400
> From: "Amadeus W. M." <amadeus84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: FC4 Gnome F10 key binding
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <pan.2005.09.20.02.23.36.992524@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:02:23 -0400, AragonX wrote:
>
> > In FC4, the F10 key is bound to bring up the menubar. How do I get rid
> of
> > this? I use MC a lot and need the F10 key. lol
>
> I've always wondered if there was anybody out there using MC, and why is
> it being still shipped with FC. Now I know.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:05:11 -0600
> From: Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Change default pdf viewer in thunderbird?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <dgng78$di2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I'm running Thunderbird in KDE on FC4. When I open a pdf attachment, I
> get gsview for some unknown reason. In my Thunderbird preferences I
> have PDF set to use /usr/bin/acroread, but apparently this is not used.
> Can someone point me where to go?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Orion
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 19, Issue 151
> ********************************************
>
