--- Begin Message ---
- To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [SPAM DETECT] Linux-compatible webcam recommendations invited
- From: Reshat Sabiq <sabiq@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:40:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Organization: ultranet.tv
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 00:35 -0500, Reshat Sabiq wrote: > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 23:05 -0500, Reshat Sabiq wrote: > > > > > I just plugged in STX: doesn't appear to be supported, but i'll play a > > little. > > I looked up QuickCam Pro 4000 as well: is it true that it supports > > crazy resolutions like 1280x960? > > > > Daniel, are you able to view QuickCam Pro 4000 stream from within > > Gnome Meeting window, or do you have to use an external app, like vlc? > > Also, are you able to use the built-in mike on QuickCam Pro 4000? > > > > Thanks. > Dudes and dudettes, > > The driver for STX can be found at: > http://mxhaard.free.fr/download.html > > I'm writing this seeing myself in GnomeMeeting, and i haven't even tried > using this thing on Windows. ;) > > Looks pretty good. The only questions i have are: > 1. GnomeMeeting has a tooltip where large resolution is indicated at > 352x288. I'm not totally sure that this webcam max resolution of 640x480 > is being utilized. I guess i'll try another app. > 2. Is built-in webcam mike supported for any webcam models? GnomeMeeting > audio settings are disabled, but maybe they would get enabled if i had a > remote video. > > P.S. I'll need to try it on Windows tomorrow, and see how quality and > performance compare. > > I love it that you can have this thing on the laptop, and it doesn't > even need A/C power. :) I'd appreciate if somebody could do a remote videoconference call with me. If interested, please shoot me a private email. I'd like to know how much bandwidth STX's max resolution consumes. It apepars Pro 4000 supports much higher resolution, but i doubt 1280x920 would be feasible for 128Kbps or 384Kbps connection for instance. And my primary other party might not have very high bandwidth. Thanks.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
