Tim wrote: >> Pick a different port, yet again. Pick something like eighty-thousand, >> it's unlikely to be blocked, nor be found so easily be nosey parkers >> probing your ports. James Wilkinson wrote: > Well, it's unlikely to be blocked, all right, but I don't think it will > work: RFC 793 specifies ports as being 16 bits, which means the highest > port number is 65535. Hmm, yes... suggested that without engaging brain properly. You really do need to pick something a bit lower. ;-) -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
