Re: vt1211 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: vt1211 support
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:59:44 +0530
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Red Hat/1.7.8-1.1.3.1

Philip Prindeville wrote:

Is the vt1211 going to be included in the modules in the 2.6.12 kernel,
or are the sources considered tainted (not GPL)?

-Philip

Modules not licensed as GPL as atleast one of its choices are not goingto be included in the upstream kernel. If its a GPL compatible licenseits can be packaged in Fedora Extras but the kernel module packagenaming has no consensus yet. There is a strong desire to see suchmodules merged upstream too.


regards
Rahul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vt1211 support
  - From: Philip Prindeville

References:
- vt1211 support
  - From: Philip Prindeville

Prev by Date: Change Sendmail Port?
Next by Date: Re: Audio CD Burning with K3B in FC4
Previous by thread: vt1211 support
Next by thread: Re: vt1211 support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]