El Jue 08 Sep 2005 6:11 PM, Gilboa Davara escribió: > Considering the size of memory, I'd say RH9. > FC1 was too buggy (in my eyes) > FC2 and 3 were too heavy to be used with 196MB. (I have a similar laptop > with 256MB) > However, be advised that using such an old distro is a major security > risk. > Not risky at all, you can download updates from fedoralegacy.org > Another interesting option is CentOS 2.1 / RHEL 2.1. > Both are still supported and should perform fairly close to RH9. > > Gilboa > > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:16 -0700, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I don't need any new features. Anything from RedHat7.3 and up should be > > fine for me. David -- David Limon Romero | dlr[@]mega.net.mx [email protected], Webmaster | http://www.mega.net.mx/~dlr Linux User#:62953 | GPG/PGP Public Key:0xAC471FBB --------------------------------------------------- MS-Win* is for those who doesn't know nothing about computing
Attachment:
pgpcauCUtWq3T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
