On 9/4/05, François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hey,
It seems the problem is with SELinux ,switch off the SELinux and see whether bind works properly or not.
Regards
Ankush Grover
----- Forwarded message from François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -----
Return-Path: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Received: from marsoul.univ-paris5.fr (marsoul.univ-paris5.fr [193.51.86.84 ])
by uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (8.13.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id j84E3DAN021140
for < francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:03:13 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by marsoul.univ-paris5.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF690D97D2
for <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:03:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from marsoul.univ-paris5.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (marsoul [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 05429-01 for <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.redhat.com [209.132.177.30])
by marsoul.univ-paris5.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF141D97A2
for <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:03:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 971747329E; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:02:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j84E2V5k023674 for < fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:02:36 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ( mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j84E2SV24500
for < fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:02:28 -0400
Received: from uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr
( pluton.math-info.univ-paris5.fr [193.48.200.14])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j84E2O3J029332
for < fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:02:25 -0400
Received: from pluton.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (localhost.localdomain
[ 127.0.0.1])
by uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (8.13.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id
j84E2CAf021049 ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:02:12 +0200
Received: (from patte@localhost)
by pluton.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id
j84E2CW8021047; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:02:12 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:02:12 +0200
From: François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx >
Message-ID: <20050904140212.GA20932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: < de87lk$568$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <430E45CD.1030909@xxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <430E45CD.1030909@xxxxxxxxx >
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Miltered: at uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr with ID 431AFEA1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr )!
X-Miltered: at uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr with ID 431AFE64.000 by Joe's
j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr )!
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0
X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: snmp versus /proc
X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases < fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: < http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: < https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0289077866=="
Sender: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at univ-paris5.fr
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 ( uranus.math-info.univ-paris5.fr [193.48.200.15]); Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:03:14 +0200
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=0.00 required=5.00
X-Spam-Level:
Sorry, I forgot to change the subject!
Bonjour,
I tried to have named working for a private network but failed and the
message in the log file is quite cryptic for me:
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: starting BIND 9.2.4 -u named
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: using 1 CPU
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named: Démarrage de named succeeded
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: loading configuration from
'/etc/named.conf'
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: listening on IPv4 interface lo,
127.0.0.1#53
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: listening on IPv4 interface
eth1, 192.168.2.1#53
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: listening on IPv4 interface
eth0, 192.168.1.5#53
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost kernel: audit(1125839758.430:0): avc:
denied { read } for pid=4099 exe=/usr/sbin/named name=root dev=hda10
ino=137955 scontext=root:system_r:named_t tcontext=root:object_r:var_t
tclass=file
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: could not configure root hints
from 'root': permission denied
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: loading configuration:
permission denied
Sep 4 18:45:58 localhost named[4098]: exiting (due to fatal error)
What's the meaning? and how to solve this problem.
I have configurated named with FC1 without any problem and tried to do
the same with FC3, but it doesn't work!
hey,
It seems the problem is with SELinux ,switch off the SELinux and see whether bind works properly or not.
Regards
Ankush Grover
