up2date w/o GPG signature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: up2date w/o GPG signature?
From: Ben Ransom <bransom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:49:26 -0700
Cc:
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I launched up2date on a new Fedora install this morning. The kernel andpackage updates come down without GPG signatures. I don't believe I'veseen this before -- anyone know if this happens occasionally, or somethingI need to do to correct it? (I have the checkbox selected in whatevermenu box comes up at first launch.)

Thanks,
-Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: up2date w/o GPG signature?
  - From: Alexander Dalloz

Prev by Date: Re: Bash recursing mp3.2.ogg conversion
Next by Date: Re: up2date w/o GPG signature?
Previous by thread: Alternative to gdmflexiserver for KDE
Next by thread: Re: up2date w/o GPG signature?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]