--- Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Di, den 30.08.2005 schrieb Antonio Olivares um > 15:02: > > > > Make sure you have forwarding set on on the > gateway > > > host: > > > > > > $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > > > > > must print out "1" (without quotes). If it does > not, > > > then activate it in > > > /etc/sysctl.conf and run "sysctl -p". Make too > sure > > > the gateway does NAT > > > by an iptables rule like: > > > > > > iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > > > > > > [eth0 should be in your case the outgoing > device] > > > > eth0 is the incoming connection should eth1 be the > > outgoing. I'm a little confused but getting > there. > > The device given with -o <device> has to be the > public net device. > > > [root@rio ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > 1 > > Ok. > > > [root@rio ~]# iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j > > MASQUERADE > > iptables: No chain/target/match by that name > > Sorry, my fault. Above should have been for the NAT > table (by default > iptables takes the filter table): > # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE The device that comes in is eth0 and the one that is acting as the output is eth1 should the above command be changed to eth1? > > > I have made most changes that Jeff and Alexander > have > > provided and I know that I am close as possible to > > getting this thing going. > > I tried to connect to the internet from within > Windows > > 98 machine and I get a DNS error and cannot > connect. > > The NATed client has to know a valid DNS server and > it's gateway is the > NAT gateway host. > > > However, the ipconfig /all, ipconfig /release_all > and > > ipconfig /renew_all give the following > > > Windows 98 IP Configuration > > > 1 Ethernet adapter : > > > Description . . . . . . . . : 3Com 3C90x Ethernet > > Adapter > > > > Physical Address. . . . . . : 00-C0-4F-73-25-42 > > > > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes > > > > IP Address. . . . . . . . . : 192.168.100.200 > > > > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > > > > Default Gateway . . . . . . : 192.168.100.1 > > > > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . : 192.168.100.1 > > > > Primary WINS Server . . . . : > > > > Secondary WINS Server . . . : > > > > Lease Obtained. . . . . . . : 08 30 05 7:22:21 AM > > > > Lease Expires . . . . . . . : 08 31 05 7:22:21 AM > > So eth1 on the Fedora machine is your inner (LAN) > network device and > eth0 for NAT. > > > It is probably something with the settings. > > Apparently everything looks ok but connection not > > good. Thanks for all suggestions and help > provided. > > Is the LAN client able to ping IP 10.154.19.136? Is > it able to ping IP > 64.233.183.99? > > > Antonio > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG > http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel > 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp > Serendipity 15:34:40 up 8 days, 12:18, load average: > 0.08, 0.07, 0.08 > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list The configuration is not working in Windows98. I do not know how to mess with the settings. I should try tomorrow with a livecd like DSL/feather linux because the machine has only 32MB of ram. [root@rio ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.154.19.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.154.19.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 [root@rio ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:2C:A6:19:28 inet addr:10.154.19.136 Bcast:10.154.19.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::250:2cff:fea6:1928/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3709 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1160 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1076413 (1.0 MiB) TX bytes:179791 (175.5 KiB) Interrupt:11 Base address:0xae00 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:C5:2A:C3 inet addr:192.168.100.1 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::260:97ff:fec5:2ac3/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:171 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:98 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:17772 (17.3 KiB) TX bytes:11736 (11.4 KiB) Interrupt:11 Base address:0xec00 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:95 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:95 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:6570 (6.4 KiB) TX bytes:6570 (6.4 KiB) sit0 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4 NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@rio ~]# Thanks for all helpful advice and suggestions. I will report back as I continue with this problem. Kind Regards, Antonio P.S. I have installed webmin but I get an error message The connection to rio.10000 has terminated unexpectedly . Some data may be tranferred. ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
