Logical Volume Management differencies between FC3 and FC4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fedora Mailing List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Logical Volume Management differencies between FC3 and FC4?
From: "Erik P. Olsen" <erik@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:31:29 +0200
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: EPO data
Reply-to: erik@xxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

During boot I get on FC3 following message:
Setting up Logical Volume Management:               [OK]
On FC4 I get:
Setting up Logical Volume Management: /var/lock: mkdir failed: Read-only
filesystem
  No volume group found                             [OK]

Are these two situations in reality the same or do I have a problem with
FC4?

-- 
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen

Prev by Date: Re: cyrus vs UW imap
Next by Date: Re: gnome-panel crash/restart circulating
Previous by thread: Printer's page size
Next by thread: verizon.net and hiedelberg fedora
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]