Re: Kmail certificate

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Kmail certificate
• From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:42:50 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.8.2

> - The ip address changed and the error is innocent because
> dataintellect.com is either too cheap or too dumb to update certificate
>
> or
>
> - The machine you think is pop3.dataintellect.com isn't that computer at
> all and you have no reason to trust the machine called
> pop3.dataintellect.com at all.

Or perhaps somebody supplied a 1.2.3.4 IP address and not the DNS name in 
their kmail config?

-Andy

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Kmail certificate
    • From: kevin . kempter

• References:
  • Kmail certificate
    • From: kevin . kempter
  • Re: Kmail certificate
    • From: kevin . kempter
  • Re: Kmail certificate
    • From: Craig White

• Prev by Date: Why FC3 doesn't see 4Gb of RAM?
• Next by Date: Re: Kmail certificate
• Previous by thread: Re: Kmail certificate
• Next by thread: Re: Kmail certificate
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread