Am Di, den 23.08.2005 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu um 0:04: > Ah! Thanks for the help: I finally understand what's going on. > > I used your reply to run a few google searches, and came up with the > following hit: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-August/msg01256.html > > Which I then used to refine my search a little more, and got this: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-August/msg00215.html > > And that helped me to understand what's going on. However, why has this > changed in the first place? Do you have a diff for what changed with X init? > > Please see the > > README.Fedora text file in the docs of the package, as the package has > > an opt-in mechanism which is not part of the upstream version. > > Besides that change, are there any other changes with the Fedora version > of Keychain from upstream? The only (main) difference between the upstream keychain rpm and the package made by me for Fedora Extras is, that the FE package ships with the opt-in mechanism. That means 2 shell scripts which will reside in /etc/profile.d/ as keychain.sh and keychain.csh and which allow the user to easily invoke keychain activity by a ~/.keychainrc file. Though it is still possible to add the keychain call within ~/.bash_profile. > Ranbir Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 00:12:39 up 20:56, 16 users, 0.19, 0.23, 0.19
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
