Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 16:13, Mike McCarty wrote:
Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
[snip]
Evenutally, a tape system will probably be more economical.
[snip]
For our 'active' data that change all the time, I use rsnapshot to a backup
machine. It'd be nice to be able to take every one or two month snapshot and
put it in a more permanent medium. But I am not sure if I can do that easily
and economically with about ~200GB data.
I reiterate, a tape system will probably be more economical in
the long run.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
