On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:03:44 +0200, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: > Must say that I do not know why it have to be done so complex as is the > case in Fedora extras now. The aforementioned thread on fedora-extras-list gives an answer to that. In particular, the thread refreshes why a single clamd is considered wrong. The clamav packages in Fedora Extras build a much more mighty and flexible framework for clamav than a single package could ever be. A single package, which "installs and works out-of-the-box" would be a dead end for the other packages which will be added on top of the clamav base packages. What appears as if it's an unnecessary list of manual configuration steps can be solved with additional packages, e.g. amavis-new.
