--- Les MikeMikesellsmlesmikeselligmail> wrote: > On 8/4/05, DotaDotanen <dotadotancohenigmail> wrote: > > > > I've heard of CentCentOS never looked into it. Now that I have, I'm > > amazed to see that they recommend to users FireFirefoxd call KoquKoquerer> and Opera broken! Apparently they have some JS oJSthe homepage that > > does not play well with those two browsers (and Safari, but no mention > > of IE). I don't think that I'd use an operating system that is > > marketed by those same people who can't even put together a standards > > compliant website. > > Note that 'marketed by' in this context actually means 'given away freely', > which also means that they aren't wasting your money to hire experts to make > their web site pretty. I'd say it's a safe bet that the people who update > the NoveNovell RedHRedHat sites are not the same as the people building the > OS. > > -- > Les MikeMikesell lesmlesmikeselligmail > > And since the current release of Centos (4.1) is built from the official Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 source RPMs, it should be the same version as supported by Red Hat. If it is bad, so is the official RHEL 4 retail box version.
