On Thursday 04 August 2005 13:26, Paul Howarth wrote: >On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:17 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote: >> On Thursday 04 August 2005 12:49 pm, Stuart Bailey wrote: >> > > >> What version of tar please? >> > > > >> > > >(GNU tar) 1.14 >> > > >> > > Bingo! >> > > >> > > tar has a rather spotted history, and 1.14 is known on the >> > > amanda list to be broken. 1.13-19, 1.13-25, and 1.15-1 are >> > > kown to work correctly. 1.13 plain is busted, and 1.14 only >> > > lasted a month or two. Nuke it, and go get either the older >> > > 1.13-25, or 1.15-1. >> > >> > Do you know if this will become a yum update? >> >> It must be: >> >> [tpolzin@excaliber ~]$ rpm -q tar >> tar-1.15.1-7.FC4 > >The OP is using FC3, for which the latest update is tar-1.14-5.FC3. > >I'd suggest getting the FC4 SRPM and rebuilding it. Thats one of the things the package managers think is busted here Paul, I built the tarball just a few days after it was released, put it in /usr/local/bin & changed the path to it in the amanda ./configure feeder script. But it works very nicely indeed. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
