Am Do, den 04.08.2005 schrieb Justin Willmert um 17:40: Please do not top-post and quote the full previous mail unstripped. > OK, I tried one more alternative, and it worked for some reason. I > changed /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd so that the 'MECH' line equaled 'pam' > instead of 'shadow'. Then I changed /usr/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf to > equal 'saslauthd' instead of 'pam'. I tried it with this system, and it > worked. Please see the reply I just sent out. You corrected your setup. The MECH change is not required, but possible. > Now I'd like to know *why* doesn't the Sendmail.conf file work alone if > so many of the sites I've looked over only mentioned Sendmail.conf, > never once hitting on the idea of saslauthd file. I've only found one > site that suggested the method that worked for me. Could somebody tell > me a reason, and if nobody can get me a reason, should this be reported > as a bug to Bugzilla? The sites you found in www are older and just reflect the old SASL version 1.5. SASL version 2 changed. It is NO bug! SASLv2 requires Sendmail.conf (or smtpd.conf for Postfix) to be set to either pwcheck_method=saslauthd or pwcheck_method=auxprop. > Justin Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 17:43:33 up 19 days, 22:16, load average: 0.23, 0.22, 0.15
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
