On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:48 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > Pushparaj Shetty wrote: > > > On 8/2/05, Daniel Normolle wrote: > <email snipped> > [snip] > >>Pushparaj Shetty wrote: > > > > The documentclass does not support the psfig , which is essential for > > including figures. > > It gives the following error message: > > > > ! Undefined control sequence. > > <argument> \psfig > > > > It worked fine in redhat 9.0. > > Please tell me how to get the same latex as in RedHat linux 9.0. > > > > > > I could only find <http://www.lbl.gov/ICSD/CIS/UNIX/TeX/psfig.html>, > which talks about documentstyle, so quite old. > [snip] > Is that what you're doing? I also note that my MikTeX (Windows atm) > doesn't have psfig installed by default, nor is it in the LaTeX users > guide. Is there any reason you can't use the graphicx package instead? > (This appears to have superseeded the graphics package mentioned in > the LaTeX user's guide 2nd edition, psfig is nowhere mentioned in that > book) > > Am I misunderstanding the use of psfig? I would do: > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{graphicx} > \begin{document} > \include{somepicture} % where somepicture.eps (for latex) or > % somepicture.pdf (for pdflatex) exists > \include{somepicture.eps} % although pdflatex will choke > \include{somepicture.png} % etc, different formats are available > % depending whether you're doing latex > % or pdflatex > \end{document} > > I'd guess from your use of it that psfig is an old package for > backwards compatibility. Try and get hold of a copy of the 2nd > edition users guide (specifically section 7.2) and where it says > `graphics' read `graphicx'. Otherwise I would suggest searching > on google for `latex graphicx'. In FC3, psfig.sty is in "/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/misc/psfig.sty" while graphics.sty and graphicx.sty are in "/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics". All 3 are in the basic tex rpm. I would presume they are in the same package in FC4. Bob -- brtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
