Mike McCarty wrote: > I see that the Red Hat site suggests Bit Torrent. > > I went to the website, and I don't see where it would > help. And I don't understand the bit about "if you don't > allow Bit Torrent to upload from your machine, you won't > get improved download rates." > > They specifically state that it is a means for publishing > things from one's own machine to the world. > > Can anyone explain, in ordinary language, what possible > advantage it would give me over, say, wget? > > Mike The most obvious advantage is not for you. It is that Bit Torrent uses everyone's bandwidth instead of only using the mirror's (which is costly). Bittorrent only "publish" the files you want to publish. -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies.
