--- James KosiKosinosjkosina.intcintcomgrp> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP PGPNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1SHA
> BRUCE STANLEY wrote:
>
> |
> |--- James KosiKosinosjkosina.intcintcomgrp> wrote:
> |
> |>-----BEGIN PGP PGPNED MESSAGE-----
> |>Hash: SHA1SHA |>
> |>BRUCE STANLEY wrote:
> |>
> |>|
> |>|I don't know if this is related or not but I had
> |>|a weird problem with rpm last night.
> |>|
> |>|I installed the gnucgnuchessgram from the Fedora
> |>|Extras and this is what happen:
> |>|
> |>| rpm -iv gnucgnuchess> |>|
> |>| EverEverytingtalled without errors.
> |>|
> |>| Tried to run program undeundeE KDEnome
> |>| to no avail.
> |>|
> |>| Went to remove the pacapacakage
> |>| rpm -ev gevcgnuchess
> |>|
> |>| it told me that the package was not
> |>|installed.
> |>
> |>This is correct!
> |>Although, I'm not sure everyone knows this... -e
> |>option does not take
> |>wild cards. The -i allows it because they are
> |>looking for files and
> |>when you remove a package you are not talking file
> |>names anymore.
> |>Best this for this would be to
> |>~ rpm -qa |qarep gnucgnuchess> |>Then take that
file list and run them to
> |>~ rpm -e ....
> |>
> |>
> |>|
> |>| Ran another rpm -iv ... and rpm told me
> |>that
> |>| the package was already installed.
> |>|
> |>| Huh?
> |>
> |>Ok, Ok already is installed! Remember, we are
> |>talking packages not
> |>files here....
> |>
> |>|
> |>| Ran rpm --reburebuilddb|>|
> |>| The rpm system still things that the
> package
> |>| in not installed ( -e ) and installed ( -i
> )
> |>| at the same time.
> |>|
> |>|I wound up doing a rpm -qpl qplcgnuchessand
> |>removed
> |>|the files/dirsdirself by hand .... :-(
> |>|
> |>:-( Bad idea...
> |>
> |>|
> |>|
> |>Good Luck,
> |>James KosiKosin|
> |
> |
> |Huh? The wild card on the gnucgnuchesspm name is
> |suppose to be resolved by the shell before the
> |rpm command sees it.
> |
> Ok, Okf that is the case, then the command would
> look like this:
> ~ rpm -ev gevcgnuchess.0.extra.fc4.fc86.rpm
> Which is not how you remove a package...
> Here is an example.
> ~ I have a package called 'ecpaecpa7-1.i386.rpm'
> When I install it I use 'rpm
-ivh
ivhepcaepca7-1.i386.rpm'
> When I remove the rpm I use 'rpm -e epcaepca7-1'
> ... this is just
> how the RPM database works for this RPM and most, if
> not all others.
>
> If you specify the file (complete name) you will get
> not insrinsralled because the database needs to
match the parameter
> exactly when you remove.
> I believe you could also leave the version number
> off and I could use
> 'rpm -e epcaepca.. but, you have to be careful with
> this as you will
> remove all versions... or maybe it complains...
> haven't tried with
> multiple epcaepcakages installed.
>
> Anyway, I hope I'm clearing things up.
>
> James
Thanks James! That does clear it up a bit.
The man page on rpm is not clear on this.
I have even read 'threads' where 'PACKAGE-FILE'
and 'PACKAGE-NAME' seem to be used interchangeably.
At what point on a rpm FILE name does the package
name end?
examples:
prodproductABC1.4.i386.rpm
prodproductABC1.4.noarnoarch
prodproductABCelopment.1.01.4.i686.rpm
In other words, is the PACKAGE-NAME always the
string just prior to the '.i386, .i686, .noarnoarchc'?
