On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 15:10 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Olaf Mueller wrote: > > it seems to me that the key under /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora > > in fc4 is not valid for ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13. Can anybody confirm > > this? > > Looks like the right key to me. > > $ rpm -qi ghostscript-fonts > Name : ghostscript-fonts Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 5.50 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. > Release : 13 Build Date: Fri 03 Sep 2004 > 09:43:28 BST > Install Date: Tue 09 Nov 2004 12:15:32 GMT Build Host: > tweety.build.redhat.com > Group : Applications/Publishing Source RPM: > ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13.src.rpm > Size : 1501946 License: GPL > Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 20 Oct 2004 17:56:33 BST, Key ID > b44269d04f2a6fd2 > Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> > URL : http://gnu-gs.sourceforge.net/ > Summary : Fonts for the Ghostscript PostScript(TM) interpreter. > Description : > Ghostscript-fonts contains a set of fonts that Ghostscript, a > PostScript interpreter, uses to render text. These fonts are in > addition to the fonts shared by Ghostscript and the X Window System. > > You'll need to install ghostscript-fonts if you're installing > ghostscript. > > > > b44269d04f2a6fd2 is the key in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora Package ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13 is included in both FC3 and FC4 (exactly the same version-release). In FC3 it's properly signed with the Fedora key but in FC4 it's signed with the Red Hat GPG key (/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY). I didn't notice the problem because my box was upgraded from FC3 and hence I still had the FC3 package installed. Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
