On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:44:04PM -0500, Jeff Vian wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 23:06 +0200, Eric Tanguy wrote: > > I would very happy to see that nx and freenx was released for fc4 by > > atrpms but i can't understand why i found nx but not freenx in > > http://dl.atrpms.net/fc4-i386/atrpms/stable/ whereas freenx seems to be > > in http://dl.atrpms.net/fc4-i386/atrpms/RPMS.bleeding/ . I have to > > enable the 2 repos to update nx and freenx ? > > > > Bleeding means testing/often unstable and definitely not for the novice. > > Yes, if one is in atrpms-stable and the other is in atrpms-bleeding and > you wish to install both, you will need to enable both repos freenx is moving to stable today. I wanted to do some more testing on x86_64 (mainly RHEL4), as the x86_64 builds are a bit adventurous. To be honest I intended to move this earlier, and forgot about it. :/ For such bug(lets) kick my ass on bugzilla.atrpms.net :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpwuYASKS1FD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
