On 7/18/05, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0501.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:41:22 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > > We certainly don't need ANOTHER media player, but we need a good media > > player! I have a large mp3 collection, and I am dependant upon a media > > library. Amarok's media library with not dispay hebrew, so I am stuck > > (in the meantime) with the harddisk with the music (20 gig) on my > > wife's windows box and playing music in Windows Media Player 10. Need > > I stress how bad I want it on my box?!? If I can't build Juk, then can > > someone reccomend to me a media player with a good library function? > > As an update here, current spec file for kdemultimedia in Core is broken > with regard to building Juk. Additionally, it would not just need > taglib-devel from Extras as a build dependency, but libtunepimp-devel, > which is neither included in Core nor Extras. > > I think it would be a plan for a package maintainer with interest in Juk > to get it (and additional build requirements) included in Extras as a > package named "juk". It could build from the same patched kdemultimedia > source tarball as included in Core. > I have no experience in that sort of thing, but if the learning curve is not too steep, then I wouldn't mind doing it. Before I go googleing and poking around, is this a newbie-freindly excersize? Because I would just love to do something good for the Fedora community. Would the extras/core/livna repros be appropriate to keep the package, or would dag be better? Dotan Cohen x-christmas.com
