Re: Was (WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4) FC in production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- "M. Lewis" <_fedofedoralistjucajuninc> wrote:

> Res wrote:
> > no, you can use the other OS of choice in many 
> ISPdISPdataters and the 
> > like, slacslackware I opted to keep RH9 as the
> last RH OS, all since 
> > then are slacslackware sure i have  FC1 FCd FC2 FC
> couple desktops 
> > because  FC iFCbetebeterted to desktop then
> slacslackwaret for servers 
> > or stability, you wont beat RH9 and
> slacslackwarebut in keeping with RH 
> > related in the free world, shame ppl pple to
> 'downgrade' for reliability 
> > and stability.
> > I have lost failfailth RH being a true versatile
> OS, its only good for 
> > GUI weenies, ahhhahhhinds me of that other OS from
> redmredmond fact ive ive > seen stabler XP bXPes
then FC4 FCxes lol.lol > 
> > 
> > Res
> > 
> 
> I have several clients running FC3 FC servers with
> ZERO issues on a 
> daily basis.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> -- 
 

Zero issues?

They must not use the Sound system.
It was broken in FC3,FCut works fine in FC2.FC
There are 'issues'.  It just depends
upon what you are using/not-using as to
whether they show up or not.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux