Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Matthew Saltzman wrote:
[snip]
> "rpm --import" the appropriate GPG keys from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ and try
> again.
>
> It would be nice if the first use of up2date would do this, at least for
> RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora and RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras.

Sounds like a regression from FC3.  Anyone bothered to file a bug yet?

-- 
William Hooper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
  - From: Jeff Vian

References:
- Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
  - From: Mirco Scaramucci
- Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
  - From: Matthew Saltzman

Prev by Date: Re: Did I make a mistake in starting with Fedora Core 4?
Next by Date: RE: Fedora Compatible ISP
Previous by thread: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
Next by thread: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]