On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:34:02PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:21:00PM -0400, davej@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > 91345d13cac519cfaaa556f30786ac01 i386/kernel-devel-2.6.12-1.1372_FC3.i586.rpm > > Dave -- I notice this switches to having kernel-devel subpackages a la FC4 > and RHEL4. While that's certainly good in general, this "mid-release" switch > threw me for a little loop. There's no mention in the changelog -- was this > switch intentional, and is it going to stay? So, I've been pondering this for an hour or so. As I mentioned in my other mail, it was unintentional, but how much would people scream at me if things stayed this way for FC3 ? It's a bit of work to put it back the way it was in earlier FC3 kernels, but it does mean pushing out yet another update to fix it. Given people will have to adapt to the change for FC4 anyway, is it going to cause huge amounts of pain to make the switch now ? Opinions? Dave
